Literatur über IPBES

Hier finden Sie eine Übersicht wissenschaftlicher Publikationen zu IPBES:

2017

• Bridgewater, P. 2017. The intergovernmental platform for biodiversity and ecosystem services (IPBES)–a role for heritage? International Journal of Heritage Studies 23 no. 1: 65-73.
• Dee, L.E., S. Allesina, A. Bonn, A. Eklöf, S.D. Gaines, J. Hines, U. Jacob, E. McDonald-Madden, H. Possingham, M. Schröter, and R.M. Thompson. 2017. Operationalizing Network Theory for Ecosystem Service Assessments. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 32 no. 2: 118-130.
• Desrousseaux, M., J.S. Kotiaho, and F. Kohler. 2017. Are Soils Taken into Consideration by the IPBES Assessment on Land Degradation and Restoration? International Yearbook of Soil Law and Policy 2016: 165-177.
• Duvic-Paoli, L. 2017. The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services or the Framing of Scientific Knowledge within the Law of Sustainable Development. International Community Law Review.
• Esguerra, A., S. Beck, and R. Lidskog. 2017. Stakeholder Engagement in the Making: IPBES’ Legitimation Politics. Global Environmental Politics 17 no. 1: 59-76.
• Hof, C., M. Winter, S. Hotes, and L. Opgenoorth. 2017. It’s not (all) about the money — supporting IPBES through challenging times. Frontiers of Biogeography 9 no. 1: 1-3.
• Jonsson, B.G., A. Báldi, and C. Lundquist. 2017. The Intergovernmental Science Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES)—A Global Model for Biodiversity Conservation. Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences. Elsevier.
• Kok, M.T.J., K. Kok, G.D. Peterson, R. Hill, J. Agard, and S.R. Carpenter. 2017. Biodiversity and ecosystem services require IPBES to take novel approach to scenarios. Sustainability Science 12 no. 1: 177-181.
• Löfmarck, E., and R. Lidskog. 2017. Bumping against the boundary: IPBES and the knowledge divide. Environmental Science & Policy 69 no.: 22-28.
• Montana, J. 2017. Accommodating consensus and diversity in environmental knowledge production: Achieving closure through typologies in IPBES. Environmental Science & Policy 68: 20-27., doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.11.011
• Obermeister, N. 2017. From dichotomy to duality: Addressing interdisciplinary epistemological barriers to inclusive knowledge governance in global environmental assessments. Environmental Science & Policy 68: 80-86.
• Oubenal, M., M. Hrabanski, and D. Pesche. 2017. IPBES, an inclusive institution? Challenging the integration of stakeholders in a science-policy interface. Ecology and Society 22 no. 1.
• Pascual, U., P. Balvanera, S. Díaz, G. Pataki, E. Roth, M. Stenseke, R.T. Watson, E. Başak Dessane, M. Islar, E. Kelemen, V. Maris, M. Quaas, S.M. Subramanian, H. Wittmer, A. Adlan, S. Ahn, Y.S. Al-Hafedh, E. Amankwah, S.T. Asah, P. Berry, A. Bilgin, S.J. Breslow, C. Bullock, D. Cáceres, H. Daly-Hassen, E. Figueroa, C.D. Golden, E. Gómez-Baggethun, D. González-Jiménez, J. Houdet, H. Keune, R. Kumar, K. Ma, P.H. May, A. Mead, P. O’Farrell, R. Pandit, W. Pengue, R. Pichis-Madruga, F. Popa, S. Preston, D. Pacheco-Balanza, H. Saarikoski, B.B. Strassburg, M. van den Belt, M. Verma, F. Wickson, and N. Yagi. 2017. Valuing nature’s contributions to people: the IPBES approach. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 26–27: 7-16.
• Schmeller, D.S., J. Niemelä, and P. Bridgewater. 2017. The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES): getting involved. Biodiversity and Conservation: 1-5.
• Tengö, M., R. Hill, P. Malmer, C.M. Raymond, M. Spierenburg, F. Danielsen, T. Elmqvist, and C. Folke. 2017. Weaving knowledge systems in IPBES, CBD and beyond—lessons learned for sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 26–27: 17-25.

2016

• Arpin, I., M. Barbier, G. Ollivier, and C. Granjou. 2016. Institutional entrepreneurship and techniques of inclusiveness in the creation of the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Ecology and Society 21 no. 4: 10.
• Berbés-Blázquez, M., J.A. González, and U. Pascual. 2016. Towards an ecosystem services approach that addresses social power relations. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 19 no.: 134-143.
• DeClerck, F. 2016. IPBES: Biodiversity central to food security. Nature 531 no. 7594: 305-305.
• Esguerra, A., S. Beck, and R. Lidskog. 2016. Stakeholder Engagement in the Making: IPBES Legitimization Politics. Global Environmental Politics 17 no. 1: 59-76.
• Heffernan, O.. 2016. Major biodiversity panel desperately seeks social scientists. Nature, 21. April 2016, doi:10.1038/nature.2016.1977
• Hrabanski, M., and D. Pesche. 2016. The Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES): Meeting the challenge of biodiversity conservation and governance: Routledge.
• Kok, M.T., K. Kok, G.D. Peterson, R. Hill, J. Agard, and S.R. Carpenter. 2016. Biodiversity and ecosystem services require IPBES to take novel approach to scenarios. Sustainability Science 12 no. 1: 177–181.
• Kovács, E.K., and G. Pataki. 2016. The participation of experts and knowledges in the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). Environmental Science & Policy 57: 131-139.
• Larigauderie, A., Stenseke, Watson, M.R.T. 2016. Biodiversity Assessments: IPBES reaches out to social scientists. Nature 532, 313, doi:10.1038/532313c
• Livoreil, B., Geijzendorffer, I., Pullin, A.S., Schindler, S., Vandewalle, M.,  Nesshöver, C. 2016. Biodiversity knowledge synthesis at the European scale: actors and steps. Biodiversity and Conservation 25: 1269-1284. doi: 10.1007/s10531-016-1143-5
• Maier, D. S., & Feest, A. 2016. The IPBES Conceptual Framework: An Unhelpful Start. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 29 no. 2: 327-347.
• Morin, J. F., Louafi, S., Orsini, A., & Oubenal, M. 2016. Boundary Organizations in Regime Complexes: A Social Network Profile of IPBES. Journal of International Relations and Development 63: 1-35.
• Nesshöver, C., M. Vandewalle, H. Wittmer, E.V. Balian, E. Carmen, I.R. Geijzendorffer, C. Görg, R. Jongman, B. Livoreil, L. Santamaria, S. Schindler, J. Settele, I. Sousa Pinto, K. Török, J. van Dijk, A.D. Watt, J.C. Young, and K.P. Zulka. 2016. The Network of Knowledge approach: improving the science and society dialogue on biodiversity and ecosystem services in Europe. Biodiversity and Conservation 25 no. 7: 1215-1233.
• Rankovic, A., Aubert, P.M., Lapeyre, R., Laurans, Y., Treyer, S. 2016. IPBES after Kuala Lumpur: Assessing knowledge on underlying causes of biodiversity loss is needed. Policy Briefs, N° 5/2016.
• Reuter, K., Timpte, M., Neßhöver, C. 2016. Disciplinary balance. How to engange social scientists in IPBES. Nature, 531, 173. doi:10.1038/531173c
• Schmeller, D.S., and P. Bridgewater. 2016. The Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES): progress and next steps. Biodiversity and Conservation 25 no. 5: 801-805.
• Tremblay, M., M. Vandewalle, and H. Wittmer. 2016. Ethical challenges at the science-policy interface: an ethical risk assessment and proposition of an ethical infrastructure. Biodiversity and Conservation 25 no. 7: 1253-1267.
• Vadrot, A.B.M., Jetzkowitz, J., Stringer, L. 2016. Social Sciences. IPBES disciplinary gaps still gaping. Nature, 530, 160. doi:10.1038/530160b

2015

• Díaz, S., Demissew, S., Carabias, J., et al. (2015). 'The IPBES Conceptual Framework  - connecting nature and people'. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14, 1-16.
• Díaz, S., Demissew, S., Joly, C., Lonsdale, W. M. and Larigauderie, A. (2015) ‘A Rosetta Stone for Nature’s Benefits to People’, PLOS Biology, 13(1). doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002040
• Vohland, K. & Nadim, T. (2015). Ensuring the success of IPBES: between interface, market place and parliament.hil. Trans. R. Soc. B:2015 370 20140013; doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0013
• Heink, U.; Marquard, E.; Heubach, K.; Jax, K., Kugel, C.; Nesshöver, C.; Neumann, R.K.; Paulsch, A.; Tilch, S.; Timaeus, J. & Vandewalle, M. (2015): Conceptualizing credibility, relevance and legitimacy for evaluating the effectiveness of science–policy interfaces: Challenges and opportunities. Science and Public Policy (forthcoming): doi: 10.1093/scipol/scu082
• Montana, J., Borie, M. (2015).'IPBES and biodiversity expertise: Regional, gender and disciplinary balance in the composition of the interim and 2015 Multidisciplinary Expert Panel'. Conservation Letters. DOI: 10.1111/conl.12192

2014

• Hochkirch, A., McGowan, P.J.K. & van der Sluijs, J. (2014). 'Publishing: Biodiversity reports need author rules'. Nature, 516, 170-170.
• Brooks, T. M., J. F. Lamoreux & J. Soberón (2014): IPBES ≠ IPCC. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 29: 543–545.
• Vadrot, A. B. M. (2014): The Politics of Knowledge and Global Biodiversity. Routledge, London.
• Beck, S., M. Borie, J. Chilvers, A. Esguerra, K. Heubach, M. Hulme, R. Lidskog, E. Lövbrand, E. Marquard, C. Miller, T. Nadim, C. Neßhöver, J. Settele, E. Turnhout, E. Vasileiadou & C. Görg (2014): Towards a reflexive turn in the governance of global environmental expertise - the cases of the IPCC and the IPBES. GAIA 23:80-87.
• Heubach, K., E. Marquard & C. Neßhöver (2014): The Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) – Historie, Status nach IPBES-1 und Trends. In: U. Feit & H. Korn (Hrsg.). BfN-Skripten 370: Treffpunkt Biologische Vielfalt XIII. BfN, Bonn. S. 9-15.
• Duraiappah, A. K., S. T. Asah, E. S. Brondizio, N. Kosoy, P. J. O'Farrell, A. H. Prieur-Richard, S. M. Subramanian & K. Takeuchi (2014): Managing the mismatches to provide ecosystem services for human well-being: a conceptual framework for understanding the New Commons. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 7:94-100.
• Hotes, S. & L. Opgenoorth (2014): Trust and Control at the Science-Policy Interface in IPBES. Bioscience 64:277-278.
• Joly, C. A. (2014): The conceptual framework of the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services / IPBES. Biota Neotropica 14:1-2.
• McInerny, G. J., M. Chen, R. Freeman, D. Gavaghan, M. Meyer, F. Rowland, D. J. Spiegelhalter, M. Stefaner, G. Tessarolo & J. Hortal (2014): Information visualisation for science and policy: engaging users and avoiding bias. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 29:148-157.
• Opgenoorth, L., S. Hotes & H. Mooney (2014): Biodiversity panel should play by rules. Nature 506:159-159.
• Turnhout, E., K. Neves & E. de Lijster (2014): 'Measurementality' in biodiversity governance: knowledge, transparency, and the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosytem Services (IPBES). Environment and Planning A 46:581-597.

2013

• Brand, U. & A. B. M. Vadrot (2013): Epistemic Selectivities and the Valorisation of Nature: The Cases of the Nagoya Protocol and the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). Law, Environment and Development Journal 9:202-220.
• Granjou, C., I. Mauz, S. Louvel & V. Tournay (2013): Assessing Nature? The Genesis of the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). Science Technology and Society 18:9-27.
• Joly, C. A. (2013): The expected role of IPBES. Biota Neotropica 13.
• Opgenoorth, L. & D. P. Faith (2013): The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), up and walking. Frontiers of Biogeography 5:207-211.
• Pe'er, G., J. A. McNeely, M. Dieterich, B. G. Jonsson, N. Selva, J. M. Fitzgerald & C. Nesshover (2013): IPBES: Opportunities and Challenges for SCB and Other Learned Societies. Conservation Biology 27:1-3.
• Turnhout, E., C. Waterton, K. Neves & M. Buizer (2013): Rethinking biodiversity: from goods and services to "living with". Conservation Letters 6:154-161.

2012

• Koetz, T., K. N. Farrell & P. Bridgewater (2012): Building better science-policy interfaces for international environmental governance: assessing potential within the Intergovernmental Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. International Environmental Agreements-Politics Law and Economics 12:1-21.
• Redford, K. H., C. Groves, R. A. Medellin & J. G. Robinson (2012): Conservation Stories, Conservation Science, and the Role of the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Conservation Biology 26:757-759.
• Spierenburg, M. (2012): Getting the Message Across. Biodiverisity Science and Policy Interfaces - A Review. GAIA 21:125-134.
• Turnhout, E., B. Bloomfield, M. Hulme, J. Vogel & B. Wynne (2012): Listen to the voices of experience. Nature 488:454-455.

2011

• Briggs, S. V. & A. T. Knight (2011): Science-Policy Interface: Scientific Input Limited. Science 333:696-697.
• Duraiappah, A. K. & D. Rogers (2011): The Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: opportunities for the social sciences. Innovation-the European Journal of Social Science Research 24:217-224.
• Hulme, M., M. Mahony, S. Beck, C. Görg, B. Hansjürgens, J. Hauck, C. Neßhöver, A. Paulsch, M. Vandewalle, H. Wittmer, S. Böschen, P. Bridgewater, M. C. Diaw, P. Fabre, A. Figueroa, K. L. Heong, H. Korn, R. Leemans, E. Lövbrand, M. N. Hamid, C. Monfreda, R. Pielke, J. Settele, M. Winter, A. B. M. Vadrot, S. Van den Hove & J. P. van der Sluijs (2011): Science-Policy Interface: Beyond Assessments. Science 333:697-698.
• Perrings, C., A. Duraiappah, A. Larigauderie & H. Mooney (2011): The Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Science-Policy Interface. Science 331:1139-1140.

2010

• Vohland, K., M. C. Mlambo, L. D. Horta, B. Jonsson, A. Paulsch & S. I. Martinez (2011): How to ensure a credible and efficient IPBES? Environmental Science & Policy 14:1188-1194.
• Görg, C., C. Neßhöver & A. Paulsch (2010): A New Link Between Biodiversity Science and Policy. GAIA 19:183-186.
• Larigauderie, A. & H. A. Mooney (2010): The Intergovernmental science-policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: moving a step closer to an IPCC-like mechanism for biodiversity. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2:9-14.
• Soberón, J. M. & J. K. Sarukhan (2010): A new mechanism for science-policy transfer and biodiversity governance? Environmental Conservation 36:265-267.

2009

• Van den Hove, S. & L. Chabason (2009): The Debate on an Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. IDDRI Working Papers No. 01/2009.
• Mooney, H. & G. Mace (2009): Biodiversity Policy Challenges. Science 325:1474.
• Loreau, M., A. Oteng-Yeboah, M. T. K. Arroyo, D. Babin, R. Barbault, M. Donoghue, M. Gadgil, C. Häuser, C. Heip, A. Larigauderie, K. Ma, G. Mace, H. A. Mooney, C. Perrings, P. Raven, J. Sarukhan, P. Schei, R. J. Scholes & R. T. Watson (2006): Diversity without representation. Nature 442:245-246.